Here's my thought, it depends on the work.
Normal maintenance and measurementsIf the work is being performed is a standard task, something that is routine and happens on a regular basis, develop a standard work procedure (SWP) and attach that to the work order.
When developing the SWP make sure that all the people that would normally sign an Energized Electrical Work Permit (EEWP) are involved and sign on it.
Then you have a document with a procedure that allows the worker to safely do the energized work.
Out of the ordinary or very infrequent workIf during the SWP the worker comes across something that is non-typical then they can stop work and re-evaulate, and an EEWP can be developed.
This is also the procedure that I recommend when you are doing infrequent work.
charlb28 wrote:
But I also see the argument that "why do I need an EWP when it is impossible to de-energize. It kind of waters down the need for an EWP.
I don't think using a EEWP on battery systems, that can't be de-energized is watering down the EEWP. An EEWP as a tool to allow everyone to step back and ensure that all hazards are controlled/managed in a manner that will allow the worker to work safely.