It is currently Wed Mar 19, 2025 10:30 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Table 410-3 Working Distances?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:01 pm 

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Posts: 8
Hi,
Can someone explain the "T" values given in footnote 1 of Table 410-3 in the 2012 NESC. I am trying to find out if they have an impact on the distance from the arc as one might infer from the language. "...calculated using the MAD... subtracting two times the assumed arc gap length and using the following T values...."

Thanks,
Craig


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Table 410-3 Working Distances?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 5:52 am 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:00 pm
Posts: 881
Location: Rutland, VT
T is the maximum anticipated per unit overvoltage factor.

_________________
Barry Donovan, P.E.
www.workplacesafetysolutions.com


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Table 410-3 Working Distances?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 6:29 am 

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Posts: 8
Hi Barry,
Thank you for the response and information. I would assume that if we want determine that other transient voltage levels should be used then we would need to analyze the system for such rather than using the default values.

Craig


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Table 410-3 Working Distances?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 9:37 am 
Arc Level

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 624
The T values were used in calculating the MAD, see Table 441-1. I expect the NESC T values and MADS should be conservative enough. In any case, you can only increase the MAD. Also note that if you use a larger MAD to calculate the distance to the arc, the result will be less conservative than what's in Table 410-3.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Table 410-3 Working Distances?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 10:12 am 

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:03 pm
Posts: 8
Hi Steven,
Thanks for the added reference. I can see that T values are TOV values. and I understand what you are saying with regards to less conservative results coming from increased MAD's but I think that when using in the NESC option for analysis in my software (CYME) the working distance is determined form me based on voltage level and the default T values given in the NESC.

Craig


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022-2025 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883