It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 11:52 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Washington Cities NEC ammendments
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2025 7:56 am 

Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 8:19 am
Posts: 45
Just came across this in the "Washington Cities Electrical Code", April 1, 2024.

Quote:
110.16 Arc-Flash Hazard Warning
Article 110.16 of the National Electrical Code is amended and supplemented by the addition of
the following text to the end of the first paragraph, to read as follows:
The flash protection marking shall be an identification plate or label meeting ANSI
Standards Z535.4-1998 or be of a type approved by the Code Official or designated
representative. The plate or label may be installed at the factory or in the field. The plate
or label may be mounted using adhesive. The plate or label shall include all of the
following:
1) The date of the flash hazard analysis.
2) The flash hazard category.
3) The incident energy level in cal/cm2 at 18 inches from the flash hazard.
4) The flash hazard boundary.
5) The personal protective equipment that people within the Flash Hazard Boundary
shall use.
The arc flash hazard shall be updated when a major modification, renovation or changes
in the electrical distribution system that could affect the results of the arc flash hazard
analysis takes place.
The arc flash hazard analysis shall take into consideration the design of the overcurrent protective
device and its opening time, including its condition of maintenance.

This amendment was created by the Washington Administrative Building Officials and has been adopted by multiple cities in Washington State. This is the first time I've come across a jurisdiction in the U.S. that has codified AF hazard labeling with HRC or calculated IE. Interesting that it does not specify how to determine this information. Does anyone know of other jurisdictions with similar rules?

_________________
Alan Lehman


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Washington Cities NEC ammendments
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2025 8:49 am 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:00 pm
Posts: 1725
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
That is quite interesting.

Requiring the date is not an NFPA 70E requirement and comes up during every revision cycle. I personally like the date on the label.
Also, "Flash Hazard Category" AND Incident Energy on the label together was an issue from the 2009 edition of NFPA 70E and is prohibited due to reasons I will not go into here (commercial/political)
Flash Hazard is a very old term and is now Arc Flash Hazard and the Category is PPE Category as of the 2015 Edition.
Flash Hazard Boundary is the "Arc Flash Boundary" I think this changed back in 2009.
Requiring 18 inches as the working distance overrides the person performing the study that has options of 24 inches and 36 inches depending on the task and equipment.
Quite outdated references but at least they are addressing the arc flash hazard which is the primary objective. Glad to see it center stage.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022-2025 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883