It is currently Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:45 pm

Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
ekstra   ara
 Post subject: Substation Kiosk
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:11 pm 

Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:06 pm
Posts: 1

I am new to the forum and would like to get some feedback on Kiosk Substations. Here in Australia and I assume all over the world, substation kiosks are key for MV distribution. They are located next to paths, in parks and basically everywhere, especially with underground power networks. Now the chance of an Arc flash event in these substations can occur and I have been looking at ways to either eliminate the risk associated with Arc flash or reduce the risk. I know that there is an Arc flash rating for these substations, being IAC-A or IAC -B or IAC - AB. But this rating is only for the medium voltage side.

Now my question is has anyone had any dealings with these kiosk substations and what did you do. I know you could get the IAC - AB rating and then also install LV MCC arc contained units but that would be huge money. Also do you agree that the MV side is much more likely to arc. The MV side has fuse protection so the Arc level is low, whereas the LV side is quite high. Being cat 4.

Would really appreciate any feedback.

Thanks Bradley

 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:38 am 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 2173
Location: North Carolina
The MV side is normally LESS likely to arc especially because the maintenance requirements to minimize damage due to tracking/PD which does not occur below about 2000 V and that you have greater separation and (in US installs of similar equipment) thesedays everything is dead front with IEEE 386 connectors, arcing faults are very unlikely. At 400 V or below arcing faults are pretty common failures (about 90% of cable/connection faults are arcing phase to ground as per IEEE Gold book). The major difference is that as the voltage decreases much below 400 V the likelihood that the arc is self sustaining is very small. IEEE 1584 does not take this into account.

There are few choices. You can approach it with PPE. You can go to solidly insulated systems. You can use a breaker on the primary side (or "smart" fuses) and create a virtual breaker arrangement on the secondary side. You can use a hot stick to operate the primary disconnect from a distance. You can build equipment similar to ATEX initiative designs where an arcing fault is harmlessly vented. Or you can test the equipment in a testing lab such as Kinectrics to determine under what if any circumstances an arcing fault can be sustained. Last possible option is adding an arc "terminator" type device that purposely shunts either the bus or resistors temporarily to quench the arc.

 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883