It is currently Tue Jul 07, 2020 10:41 am



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
ekstra   ara
 Post subject: Article in CSE Magazine
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:18 am 

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:00 pm
Posts: 19
Has anyone else seen the article http://www.csemag.com/single-article/pr ... inter%5D=1?

They have two TCCs at the end that are supposed to be before and after changing out breakers, and a resulting reduction in arc flash energy. I just don't see it. Can anyone see what they are supposed to be showing.

Also, the title of the article is "Preventing arc flash in mission critical facilities". They are not preventing anything, only mitigating.

Thanks


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Article in CSE Magazine
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:25 am 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 2174
Location: North Carolina
dkidd wrote:
Has anyone else seen the article http://www.csemag.com/single-article/pr ... inter%5D=1?

They have two TCCs at the end that are supposed to be before and after changing out breakers, and a resulting reduction in arc flash energy. I just don't see it. Can anyone see what they are supposed to be showing.


The "arcing fault" indication is in the middle of the trip curve so I'd tend to agree...it looks like the intent is there but the curve shown is the wrong TCC for the "mitigated" case".

Quote:
Also, the title of the article is "Preventing arc flash in mission critical facilities". They are not preventing anything, only mitigating.


Based on the point of the article the hazard magnitude is reduced to the point where PPE and/or further efforts are not required. It's not "prevention" as in the top category in ALARP/ALARA in ANSI Z10 but rather the second tier down (reduction). This is vastly different from wearing PPE which is at the bottom of the ALARA/ALARP scale, below even simple things like administrative procedures such as implementing EEWP's.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Article in CSE Magazine
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:49 am 
Sparks Level
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 10:01 am
Posts: 227
Location: Indiana
PaulEngr wrote:
.........

The "arcing fault" indication is in the middle of the trip curve so I'd tend to agree...it looks like the intent is there but the curve shown is the wrong TCC for the "mitigated" case".


Agreed. Looks like the exact same as the "before" curve.

_________________
SKM jockey for hire


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2019 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883