It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:20 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: adjusting Inst. setting on untested/unmainained MCCB's.
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2021 6:48 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:53 am
Posts: 28
Don't touch that dial... with maintenance of vintage molded case breakers. or lack thereof, being the elephant in the room when it comes to the reliability of many AF Hazard analyses and spawning lengthy disclaimers...I am interested in you all's thoughts / experience with adjusting instantaneous trip settings on similarly untested/unmaintained molded case (MCCB) breakers (to improve coordination or reduce AF clearing time and lower IE).

I am thinking that if we shouldn't trust an unmaintained and untested breaker to follow the manf's published clearing times, then we shouldn't trust adjustments made to a 20 year old untested/unmaintained breaker settings...and need to proceed cautiously in recommending setting changes to unmaintained breakers.... Seems like a crap shoot.

Are the reliability of MCCB (thermal mag and electronic) trip setting adjustments well into a breaker's expected life hearty... or is the trip setting mechanism (particularly instantaneous) affected by age, lack of exercising etc?

Curious as to what you think.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: adjusting Inst. setting on untested/unmainained MCCB's.
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2021 8:08 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 12:02 pm
Posts: 22
Location: Slave Lake, Alberta
I haven't encountered any issues changing instantaneous trip on older MCCB's in the field. Typically done when replacing buckets with spares which had been previously used on lower HP motors and trip setting had to be increased. Some of those were over 30 years old in which starter contacts had been replaced many times.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: adjusting Inst. setting on untested/unmainained MCCB's.
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 5:45 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:53 am
Posts: 28
Bumping this question. I have had the same concern.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: adjusting Inst. setting on untested/unmainained MCCB's.
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 5:48 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:53 am
Posts: 28
Too funny. Just noticed i was the OP/original poster.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: adjusting Inst. setting on untested/unmainained MCCB's.
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 6:55 am 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:00 pm
Posts: 1727
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Not an MCCB but, humorous a few decades later...

In the 90's I was raising the instantaneous of a first generation electronic trip breaker (not mentioning manufacturer) due to setting changes from a coordination study.

The circuit breaker tripped when RAISING the setting. It turns out there was a design glitch and when the setting was changed from one setting to the next it would drop to zero in between. OOPS*

*undocumented feature. :o

It was quickly resolved by the manufacturer.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: adjusting Inst. setting on untested/unmainained MCCB's.
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 8:30 am 

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2022 11:35 am
Posts: 28
BGnan wrote:
Don't touch that dial... with maintenance of vintage molded case breakers. or lack thereof, being the elephant in the room when it comes to the reliability of many AF Hazard analyses and spawning lengthy disclaimers...I am interested in you all's thoughts / experience with adjusting instantaneous trip settings on similarly untested/unmaintained molded case (MCCB) breakers (to improve coordination or reduce AF clearing time and lower IE).

I am thinking that if we shouldn't trust an unmaintained and untested breaker to follow the manf's published clearing times, then we shouldn't trust adjustments made to a 20 year old untested/unmaintained breaker settings...and need to proceed cautiously in recommending setting changes to unmaintained breakers.... Seems like a crap shoot.

Are the reliability of MCCB (thermal mag and electronic) trip setting adjustments well into a breaker's expected life hearty... or is the trip setting mechanism (particularly instantaneous) affected by age, lack of exercising etc?

Curious as to what you think.



We always put the disclaimer that breakers should be tested to ensure proper trip functions especially if the change is being made to reduce AFIE.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: adjusting Inst. setting on untested/unmainained MCCB's.
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2023 10:06 am 
Arc Level

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:35 am
Posts: 604
Location: Wisconsin
Thermal magnetic breakers are not known to experience aging issues with the calibration of their trip units. Their most common problem seems to be the migration of lubrication of the actual operating mechanism, which can be mitigated by simply cycling the breaker On and Off yearly.

Electronic trip molded case breakers have been known experience aging issues with the calibration of their trip units. These should be tested per their manufacturer's recommendations

Larger drawout style power circuit breakers require regular maintenance and testing.

Of course you will always be able to find examples of outlier situations.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022-2025 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883