It is currently Mon Sep 27, 2021 7:20 am



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
ekstra   ara
 Post subject: OSHA SubPart S
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:17 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:21 am
Posts: 35
Location: Ellijay, GA
Here's a good one....

I just read on the website for The Workplace Safety Awareness Council that the August 2007 Revision on the 29CFR1910.301-.399 requires arc flash hazard boundaries, equipment labeling and PPE. Can anyone confrim this? I am trying to find a place to purchase the standard, but so far I can't find a place to do that. The above mentioned website is linked below.


http://www.wpsac.org


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 9:02 am 

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:00 am
Posts: 2
That would be an earth shaker. If you find this, please post it here.
Thanks!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:55 pm 
Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
PDS_Dave wrote:
Here's a good one....

I just read on the website for The Workplace Safety Awareness Council that the August 2007 Revision on the 29CFR1910.301-.399 requires arc flash hazard boundaries, equipment labeling and PPE. Can anyone confrim this? I am trying to find a place to purchase the standard, but so far I can't find a place to do that. The above mentioned website is linked below.


http://www.wpsac.org


You were misinformed (Too bad ti should be) the Aug revision adopted the installation section of the 70E, not the safe work practices, that is coming soon, I heard Feb 2008 but we are way past that already.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:06 am 

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:15 am
Posts: 3
You can get PDF's of specific CFR sections via this website:

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/retrieve.html

Also, here is a link to the 2005 Federal Register where OSHA proposed changes to it's utility standard 1910.269 to add arc flash requirements:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2005_register&position=all&page=34866

To my knowledge, these changes have not been adopted into 1910.269. I bet they are still being litigated.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: OSHA SubPart S
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 12:15 am 

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 12:13 am
Posts: 1
It seems 1EEE 1584 provides guidance in cutting off calculations at 2.0 seconds of arc exposure. I provide training as such and caution the workers that for certain job tasks/approaches this assumed time constraint may not be valid.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2019 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883