It is currently Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:12 pm

Author Message

 Post subject: Arc Flash Protection Boundary questionPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:35 am

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:19 am
Posts: 8
Location: Troy, Missouri
NFPA70E (2009) Article 130.3(A)(1) Voltage Levels between 50V & 600V.....The Arc Flash Protection Boundary shall be 4 ft, based on the product of clearing time of 2 cycles and the available bolted fault current of 50kA......

Is this saying if we use 4ft as the boundary, we don't have to run calculations. Incoming voltage is 480V & AmerunUE says the available Fault current is 3800A and the Bolted Fault Current is 3700 to our building. I'm not sure I understand what they are infurring to in this particular paragraph. Can anyone explain. Should calculations be done at every panel if you want the AFPB to be less than 4 ft?

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:00 am
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
NFPA70E (2009) Article 130.3(A)(1) Voltage Levels between 50V & 600V.....The Arc Flash Protection Boundary shall be 4 ft, based on the product of clearing time of 2 cycles and the available bolted fault current of 50kA......

Is this saying if we use 4ft as the boundary, we don't have to run calculations. Incoming voltage is 480V & AmerunUE says the available Fault current is 3800A and the Bolted Fault Current is 3700 to our building. I'm not sure I understand what they are infurring to in this particular paragraph. Can anyone explain. Should calculations be done at every panel if you want the AFPB to be less than 4 ft?

Well what are your clearing times?

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:37 pm

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:19 am
Posts: 8
Location: Troy, Missouri
The clearing time for the main breaker is 1cycle according to the time current curves at the fault current level stated by UE.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:52 pm
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:00 pm
Posts: 1637
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
The 2009 Edition of NFPA 70E reduced the short circuit current X clearing time to 100 kA - cycles or 1667 Amp seconds. They basically cut the 2004 Edition's 50,000 Amps - seconds by 2/3.

Yes, according to NFPA 70E if the combination of clearing time and current does not exceed 1667, you can use 4 feet without additional calculations. To put it into perspective, the arc flash protection boundary is the minimum distance where unprotected people must stand if an arc flash hazard exists so IMHO the larger the boundary, the better.

_________________
Jim Phillips, P.E.
Brainfiller.com

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:19 pm
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
The clearing time for the main breaker is 1cycle according to the time current curves at the fault current level stated by UE.

No such thing as a 1 cycle breaker. Is this fused? What is the clearing time of the calulated arcing current?

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:47 am

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:19 am
Posts: 8
Location: Troy, Missouri
Zog – In the Time-Current curve that I have in front of me the Instantaneous Trip zone for the particular breaker is from .001 seconds to .015 sec (approx 1 cycle) the current range is 27,00A-65,000A for the instantaneous trip…… then the curve move to less current to a more infinite time. Doesn’t that mean the bolted fault current of 3700A is within the 1 cycle trip for this breaker?

BrainFiller – if we can meet the calculation and establish the minimum 4 ft zone for people clearance from the panel we would like to. Am I reading the information correctly…. For example this particular Time Curve……. If I look at the min and max at 1 second the values are approx 120Amin and 300Amax so for this particular breaker (if it was the main) the breaker would trip somewhere between 120-300A in 1 second and because it is less than 1667A no other calculations would need to be done and we could use the 4 ft minimum distance for unprotected personnel. Or do I look at the values at 2 cycles (.033) which would be between 500A min or 1200A max?

I am unsure which I should use. We have many machine panels and building panels that I need to collect data on for the main breaker and wanted to start my calculations correctly to see if it qualifies for the 4 ft min distance. Any help would be appreciated as to whether I am in the right ball park!!!

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:15 pm
 Arc Level

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:35 am
Posts: 551
Location: Wisconsin
Zog – In the Time-Current curve that I have in front of me the Instantaneous Trip zone for the particular breaker is from .001 seconds to .015 sec (approx 1 cycle) the current range is 27,00A-65,000A for the instantaneous trip…… then the curve move to less current to a more infinite time. Doesn’t that mean the bolted fault current of 3700A is within the 1 cycle trip for this breaker?

If the available bolted fault current is 3800A (is this a typo?) it is nowhere near the breaker's instantaneous trip of 27,000A. If the utility actually said it is 38,000A for a bolted fault, it is probably a 'made up' number (because it looks to be rounded) used for equipment selection purposes and should not be used for an arc flash analysis.

Also, when evaluating the clearing time of the device, you need to use the arcing fault current that flows through the device, not the bolted fault current available at its line side terminals.

What type of breaker is this?

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:04 pm

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:19 am
Posts: 8
Location: Troy, Missouri
The NFPA70E specifically says Bolted Fault Current (see above for section)....... the fault current numbers and Bolted fault number was given to me by Plant Manager from the Utility Company...... does the 3700A BFC seems unrealistic........ our servive to the building MAX current is 1800A provided by transformer is what I was told. We are just a moderate size manufacturing plant. The main breakers in our distribution panels are all Siemens of assorted sizes.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:35 pm
 Sparks Level

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:44 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Charlotte, NC
Just a guess, but sounds that if your service is 480/277 Y then you might be served from a 1500 kVA transformer based on the 1800 amps you mentioned. Is this the case? 3,700 sounds way too low and 37,000 sounds like it might be infinite source for a 1500 kVA transformer with %z of about 5%.

I would definitely verify the current numbers.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:54 pm
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
The main breakers in our distribution panels are all Siemens of assorted sizes.

That does nto help, what type of Siemens breakers from the nameplate, also what is the trip unit catalog #?

I also agree with the other guys about your fault current levels being off and the fact you need to look at arcing current too.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:45 pm
 Arc Level

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:35 am
Posts: 551
Location: Wisconsin
The NFPA70E specifically says Bolted Fault Current (see above for section)....... the fault current numbers and Bolted fault number was given to me by Plant Manager from the Utility Company...... does the 3700A BFC seems unrealistic........ our servive to the building MAX current is 1800A provided by transformer is what I was told. We are just a moderate size manufacturing plant. The main breakers in our distribution panels are all Siemens of assorted sizes.

NFPA 70E says "When the product of clearing times and bolted
fault current exceeds 100 kA cycles, the Arc Flash Protection Boundary shall be calculated." It does not specifically say what fault current is used to determine the opening time. I agree, you can make the case for using the clearing time of the bolted fault.

Yes, the value of 3,700A SCA is unrealistic for any service much larger than about 100A.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:40 pm
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:00 pm
Posts: 1637
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Is the 3700 Amps on the primary side of the transformer? If not, the transformer must be quite small, perhaps 112.5 kVA or 150 kVA?

The "4 foot rule" has been around for a while. The referenced short circuit current is bolted. If the bolted current is used to determine the protective device clearing time it could cause an incorrect answer since the arcing current can be significantly lower than the bolted current.

If you really do only have 3700 Amps of bolted current, the arcing equivalent could be low enough that the protective device does not trip in the instantaneous region but rather in the time delay region. This could result in quite a lot of incdent energy and as a result, require a much larger arc flash protection boundary.

_________________
Jim Phillips, P.E.
Brainfiller.com

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:13 am

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:19 am
Posts: 8
Location: Troy, Missouri
Back to the beginning......

Thank you for your responses........ I will start again with getting some reasonable data from the utility company regarding available fault current, bolted fault current, and more information on the transformer supplying our building. I am collecting data on the main power incoming swith board and all the subpanels and circuit protection. Maybe in a few days I'll have enough information I can ask more specific questions. Is there anything else any of you are aware of that I should seek out before trying to determine whether we can apply the 4Ft rule boundary to all of our subpanels?

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 7 hours

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Forum Library / Articles The Lounge    Question of the Week - What Do You Think?    Arcflashforum.com Feedback and Announcements    Off Topic Discussions    News in Electrical Safety Arc Flash and Electrical Safety    General Discussion    Electrical Safety Practices    Equipment to Reduce Arc Flash Dangers    Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Arc Flash Studies    General Discussion    Arc Flash Labels    Software for Arc Flash Studies    System Modeling and Calculations    NEW! Electrode Configuration Library – 2018 IEEE 1584 Codes and Standards    CSA Z462 Workplace Electrical Safety    EAWR Electricity at Work Regulations, HSE - Europe    OSHA CFR Title 29    IEEE 1584 - Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations    NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code - NEC (R)    NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code    NFPA 70E - Electrical Safety in the Workplace    2015 NFPA 70E Share It Here    Arc Flash Photos    Your Stories    What's Wrong Here? by Joe Tedesco
© 2022 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883