It is currently Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:17 pm

Author Message

 Post subject: Reasons For Equipment Evaluation Fail & Cable ProtectionPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 10:19 am

Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 2
Hi All Experts,

Request to help me to understand reasons for equipment evaluation fail based on the power system worst-case short circuit :

(*N3) Calc Arc Flash Line/Load Side Evaluation Category result is Dangerous!
(*Calc Isc kA) Device did not pass. Device is either marginal (100%) or Failed (100%) of the device library Isc rating.

How to investigate of reasons for "Cabling was found unprotected" under PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY.

Best regards,

India.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:38 am
 Plasma Level

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:00 pm
Posts: 863
Location: Rutland, VT
Hello,
Welcome to the forum!

In regards to your questions:
1. For that scenario, the arc flash hazard result is greater than 40 cal/cm^2, so it is considered Dangerous.
2. The equipment is overdutied. What that means is the available short circuit current at that device is at or exceeds the rating of the device. For example a device (such as a molded case breaker or panel) is rated at a withstand current of 10 kA but the available short circuit current at that device is 12 kA. This device is considered overdutied and needs to be replaced with a device rated above the available short circuit current.
3. I think what the cable unprotected is where a conductor is rated at say 65 A but the breaker protecting the cable is 100 A. In very simple terms (as there are limitations) per the code in the USA, that cable should have a breaker that is 70 A or less protecting it.

_________________
Barry Donovan, P.E.
www.workplacesafetysolutions.com

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:39 am

Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 2
Thanks wbd for detail explanation, great help!
1. Clear, no doubt.
2. How to calculate available short circuit current? In our case three transformers (2.5MVA, 33kV/440V, 4.64%Z) feeding three section (parts) of panel, three section (parts) are inter connected with breaker to connect each other to run whole system on one or two transformers if required. No parallel operation of Transformers. As per our calculation one transformer not able to feed short circuit current which shows in our arc flash analysis report. Could you please help to understand this.
3. Yes, breaker protecting the cable is having higher capacity, but in our breaker Schneider Masterpact Mircrologic 2 have current setting. If we set current accordingly (below ampacity of cable) is cable will get protected?

Best regards,
India.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:14 pm
 Plasma Level

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:00 pm
Posts: 863
Location: Rutland, VT
For #2, can you post the one line and possible just the section of the report. Then we can see visually what the situation is. Might be easier to understand.
3. yes, if the breaker has an adjustable pick up, then it can be set equal or less than the cable ampacity.

_________________
Barry Donovan, P.E.
www.workplacesafetysolutions.com

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 7 hours

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Forum Library / Articles The Lounge    Question of the Week - What Do You Think?    Arcflashforum.com Feedback and Announcements    Off Topic Discussions    News in Electrical Safety Arc Flash and Electrical Safety    General Discussion    Electrical Safety Practices    Equipment to Reduce Arc Flash Dangers    Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Arc Flash Studies    General Discussion    Arc Flash Labels    Software for Arc Flash Studies    System Modeling and Calculations    NEW! Electrode Configuration Library – 2018 IEEE 1584 Codes and Standards    CSA Z462 Workplace Electrical Safety    EAWR Electricity at Work Regulations, HSE - Europe    OSHA CFR Title 29    IEEE 1584 - Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations    NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code - NEC (R)    NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code    NFPA 70E - Electrical Safety in the Workplace    2015 NFPA 70E Share It Here    Arc Flash Photos    Your Stories    What's Wrong Here? by Joe Tedesco
© 2022 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883