It is currently Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:13 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: 70E-2015 Tabular Method
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:39 pm 
Offline
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 1758
Location: North Carolina
I know this is picking a fight but consider the fact that my current day job (and sometimes nights and weekends) is field service engineer. Most of the time I'm a guest in someone else's plant. The host may or may not have spent a considerable amount of time and money on an arc flash study, and the study itself may or may not be of the best quality if they have one. In other words a lot of the time the common use of the 70E Tables may be all that I have to go on. So I have more than a little vested interest in whether or not the 70E tabular method as actually practiced (ignoring footnotes) actually works.

So when I saw a statement by Hoagland that actually goes further in suggesting that the fact that arc resistant PPE's properties of not propagating a flame may be the majority of the benefit, that got my attention. I've worn the stuff for years even when I was a young kid practicing welding on a family farm back in the 1970's. Back then a long sleeve cotton checked or denim shirt, blue jeans, and a heavy chrome tanned leather jacket (if you had the fancy stuff) was all that was available. The molten metal slag might penetrate but as long as the shirt wasn't nylon or something similar that melted or caught fire, it worked. Small slag burns were considered part of the trade at that time.

Fast forward to today, Hoagland's statement had a lot of merit to it but I was excited to see it proven out. I got a copy of the referenced article only to find that the proof was nowhere to be found. I was disappointed and in skeptical...I smelled a dirty, rotten rat of a claim. I just had to dig in and tear it to shreds so that I could prove to myself whether Hoagland's claim was really just shameless promotion of arc flash PPE or whether he simply did a quick and dirty analysis that got forgotten and never published. After some time I finally decided to simply do the data analysis myself.

To say the least I was actually shocked at what I actually found to be the case. You'll have to read it though to find out the conclusion to this little story. I know this is a controversial subject so I definitely encourage criticism both of my method and of the crazy idea itself because the potential implications are far reaching.


Attachments:
arc flash chart.xlsx [7.86 KiB]
Downloaded 62 times
doan hoagland neal analysis.pdf [50.86 KiB]
Downloaded 54 times
Report this post
Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 70E-2015 Tabular Method
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:21 am 
Offline
Sparks Level

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:35 pm
Posts: 91
Paul, could you explain your process what each of the columns in your spread sheet means? I think I get what 0 and 1 are for, but please explain.


Report this post
Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
© 2017 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883