It is currently Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:42 am



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
ekstra   ara
 Post subject: Huge calculated AF Boundary
PostPosted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:23 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 12:23 pm
Posts: 13
I just saw a study that had 166 cal/cm^2 and an arc flash boundary of 30'. This is on the primary side of the service disconnect for a facility.

How realistic is that 30'?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Huge calculated AF Boundary
PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 1:12 pm 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:00 pm
Posts: 825
Location: Rutland, VT
It all depends on how the study was done. Did they model from the utility primary fuse in with the primary fuse as the protective device for the main service equipment? Did they use a 2 second cutoff for the clearing time? Did they use available short circuit current from the utility or was it an infinite bus value? Let's start with those questions prior to determining validity of result.

_________________
Barry Donovan, P.E.
www.workplacesafetysolutions.com


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Huge calculated AF Boundary
PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 3:26 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 12:23 pm
Posts: 13
Yes, utility primary fusing was modeled and is the protective device for main service equipment (xmfr is 3,250 kva)
Yes, a 2 second cut off time was used.
The short circuit current from the utility was 4,300 A at 12470 V.

I thought I read somewhere (and cannot find) that the equations can over-estimate arc flash boundary to something that is not realistic so wanted to reach out to see if that were the case.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Huge calculated AF Boundary
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:01 am 
Sparks Level

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:38 am
Posts: 50
Location: Westminster, MD
danocap1982 wrote:
I just saw a study that had 166 cal/cm^2 and an arc flash boundary of 30'. This is on the primary side of the service disconnect for a facility.

How realistic is that 30'?


166 calories with a 30-foot AF boundary is realistic for the secondary of a 480V, 3750 kVA transformer, but not the primary.
If the label is on the transformer itself then it makes sense because the secondary is exposed when opening the cover.
John M


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2019 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883