It is currently Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:24 pm

Author Message

 Post subject: Remote RackingPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:45 am
 Sparks Level

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:19 pm
Posts: 56
This topic has been debated several times already but I though was worth bringing it up again; maybe there are some new members with new opinions on the subject.

We continue to have problems with not only trying to explain to others but in convincing our selves thereâs an arc flash hazard at remote racking distances (20 â 25 feet). We agree there are some possible hazards associated with flying debris but we are not convinced thereâs an actual burn hazard at these distances. Most switchgear remote racking takes place doors closed with the operator standing at some off angle with respect to the breaker cubical. In some cases the control cord does not always move them out of the calculated flash boundary. As most are aware of the IEEE equations can produce some truly unbelievable flash protection distances. We know vendors are offering wireless options with hundreds of feet of range or you can add additional cable but is this truly needed?

How are you discussing this issue with your sites and clients? If you calculate HRC 4 at 24â or 36â do you tell them they need HRC 4 PPE at 25 feet if the FPB is beyond 25 feet? Do you tell them they still need arc flash PPE at 25 feet but it can be less than the 24â or 36â value? If so, how are you determining this lesser value? Weâve tried setting the working distance to the control cable length and recalculating the incident energy at this distance but we feel the results are overly conservative and not valid.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:35 am
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
The whole point of remote racking is to eliminate the need for PPE so doing the operations outside the AFB is desirable, even if it may be conservative.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:44 pm
 Sparks Level

Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 3:19 pm
Posts: 56
According to the 1584 standard the distance factor (x) was developed based on test data out to 60â â 72â. The question is whatâs the assumed accuracy of the model beyond these distances? One could argue the model is only accurate to calculate incident energy values and flash boundaries out to 72â at best.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:11 pm
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
SCGEng1 wrote:
According to the 1584 standard the distance factor (x) was developed based on test data out to 60â â 72â. The question is whatâs the assumed accuracy of the model beyond these distances? One could argue the model is only accurate to calculate incident energy values and flash boundaries out to 72â at best.

Too many variables I would think, what about that 50/51 relay flying at your head at 500 MPH?

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 7 hours

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Forum Library / Articles The Lounge    Question of the Week - What Do You Think?    Arcflashforum.com Feedback and Announcements    Off Topic Discussions    News in Electrical Safety Arc Flash and Electrical Safety    General Discussion    Electrical Safety Practices    Equipment to Reduce Arc Flash Dangers    Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Arc Flash Studies    General Discussion    Arc Flash Labels    Software for Arc Flash Studies    System Modeling and Calculations    NEW! Electrode Configuration Library â 2018 IEEE 1584 Codes and Standards    CSA Z462 Workplace Electrical Safety    EAWR Electricity at Work Regulations, HSE - Europe    OSHA CFR Title 29    IEEE 1584 - Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations    NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code - NEC (R)    NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code    NFPA 70E - Electrical Safety in the Workplace    2015 NFPA 70E Share It Here    Arc Flash Photos    Your Stories    What's Wrong Here? by Joe Tedesco
© 2022 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883