It is currently Fri Jan 30, 2026 1:42 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Unable to protect from thermal damage
PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 8:59 am 

Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2024 5:19 am
Posts: 33
I have been using both Easypower and SKM and I keep getting a warning on the cable rating not being able to protect from thermal damage.
Its just confusing because for example if the breaker is 30Amps and the builder used 10 AWG. The cable should be good since 10Awg is rated for 35 Amps. Is there a setting I am missing?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Unable to protect from thermal damage
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2025 7:19 am 
Sparks Level

Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2019 11:42 am
Posts: 166
As long as the breaker is sized to protect the cable/wire per NEC or other standard, it is ok. This is for low voltage (<=600V). Typically, cable damage curves are not plotted on TCCs for LV circuits given the prior statement.

As far as MV and HV systems: it's a good idea to plot the cable damage curves and seeing how they perform w/ the OCPD since you are dealing w/ a considerable amount of I^2R heating.

Mike


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Unable to protect from thermal damage
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2026 4:00 pm 

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2025 2:54 pm
Posts: 46
mpparent wrote:
As long as the breaker is sized to protect the cable/wire per NEC or other standard, it is ok. This is for low voltage (<=600V). Typically, cable damage curves are not plotted on TCCs for LV circuits given the prior statement.

As far as MV and HV systems: it's a good idea to plot the cable damage curves and seeing how they perform w/ the OCPD since you are dealing w/ a considerable amount of I^2R heating.

Mike


Mike, do you know why EasyPower does this? Do you know if SKM does the same thing?

Conversely, I ran into a situation recently where EasyPower's AutoCoordination feature recommended setting the LT settings on two 250A-300A MCCBs to a current level greater than the wire's rating. One of the instances it included a notification that doing so would exceed the rating of the wire, but the other one did not. I know any auto-features need a human to doublecheck the findings, but programs like EasyPower and SKM are using complicated calculations; it seems bizarre to me that it would get that wrong.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022-2025 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883