It is currently Wed Dec 06, 2023 5:51 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
ekstra   ara
 Post subject: AFPB: Your take on 1.5 cal/cm^2 in some limited conditions
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:28 am 
Sparks Level

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:05 am
Posts: 252
NFPA 70E, in article 130.3(A)(2), allows one to use 1.5 cal/cm^2 as the basis for calculating the AFPB if a) the voltage is greater than 600 V, and b) the clearing time is equal or less than 0.1 sec. If the clearing time is more than 0.1 sec, then 1.2 cal/cm^2 is to be used for calculating the AFPB.

Now, I haven't seen much people use the 1.5 cal/cm^2 for calculating the AFPB.
Is it not used because it's not very known?
Is it not used because article 130.7(C)(5) says that FR PPE is to be worn "wherever there is possible exposure to an electric arc flash above the threshold incident-energy level for a second-degree burn [5 J/cm^2 (1.2 cal/cm^2)]", so per 70E one must wear PPE even outside the AFPB in those conditions?
Is it not used because it increases the hazard outside the AFPB?

What's your opinion on this?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:44 pm 
Sparks Level

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:24 pm
Posts: 61
I would guess that it is because:

1) This is a change from the earlier edition of 70E and not everyone is aware of the change.

2) People tend to be conservative with respect to liability/safety.

3) It's one more variable to consider and the whole process is already pretty cumbersome.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883