It is currently Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:38 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
ekstra   ara
 Post subject: 1.2 versus 1.5 cal at Arc Flash Boundary
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:43 pm 
Offline
Arc Level

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:49 pm
Posts: 480
Location: New England
"...At voltage levels about 600V, the Flash Protection Boudary is the distance at which the incident energy equals 1.2 cal/cm2. For situations where fault clearing time is 0.1s or faster, the Flash Protection Boudary is the distance at which the incident energy level equals 1.5 cal/cm2..."

First, let me verify. The second sentence, increasing to 1.5 cal/cm2, stands alone regardless of voltage. It is good for all voltages both above and below 600V?

Second, if 1.2 cal/cm2 is the threshold for a 2nd degree burn, and since IE includes clearing time in the formula, why is it acceptable to increase the burn threshold to 1.5 cal/cm2.

Third, do you think it is a good idea to add in this complexity to an already complicated guideline. How much difference does it really make to the boundary distance. I realize heat is proportional to the distance squared, so the reduction may be significant. But is it a good practice. I pound the 1.2 cal limit into my electricians, now I have to qualify it for clearing times less than 0.1 seconds. Are people actually do this and would it not be a better idea to just keep the 1.2 cal limit throughout and live with slightly wider AF boundaries?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:04 am 
Offline
Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
I dont have a solid answer to that question but I would stick with the 1.2 cal for your guys. K.I.S.S. (Not calling you stupid)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:19 am 
Offline
Arc Level

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:49 pm
Posts: 480
Location: New England
I answered one of my own questions. The 1.5 cal rule is ONLY for "Voltage Levels above 600V". I saw the 1.5 cal rule in the Annex, but in the body of the text 130.3.2 the headers is "Voltage Levels above 600V" so then anything that follows even if not specified would have to fall in that category.

But can someone answer why the 1.5 cal rule came to be and how it performs for FR clothing built to a 1.2 cal world.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:23 am 
Offline
Arc Level

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:49 pm
Posts: 480
Location: New England
Zog, no offense taken. "Stupid is as stupid does". I use the 1.2 cal value regardless of voltage because its not worth dealing with the complexity to gain a few inches in arc boundary. But I still would like to know why its there. For the 2014 release - I plan to submit a whole new guideline to totally replace Art 130 - and it will be 2 pages long.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
© 2017 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883