It is currently Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:11 pm

Author Message

 Post subject: 1.2 versus 1.5 cal at Arc Flash BoundaryPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:43 pm
 Arc Level

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:49 pm
Posts: 498
Location: New England
"...At voltage levels about 600V, the Flash Protection Boudary is the distance at which the incident energy equals 1.2 cal/cm2. For situations where fault clearing time is 0.1s or faster, the Flash Protection Boudary is the distance at which the incident energy level equals 1.5 cal/cm2..."

First, let me verify. The second sentence, increasing to 1.5 cal/cm2, stands alone regardless of voltage. It is good for all voltages both above and below 600V?

Second, if 1.2 cal/cm2 is the threshold for a 2nd degree burn, and since IE includes clearing time in the formula, why is it acceptable to increase the burn threshold to 1.5 cal/cm2.

Third, do you think it is a good idea to add in this complexity to an already complicated guideline. How much difference does it really make to the boundary distance. I realize heat is proportional to the distance squared, so the reduction may be significant. But is it a good practice. I pound the 1.2 cal limit into my electricians, now I have to qualify it for clearing times less than 0.1 seconds. Are people actually do this and would it not be a better idea to just keep the 1.2 cal limit throughout and live with slightly wider AF boundaries?

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:04 am
 Plasma Level

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:58 am
Posts: 1103
Location: Charlotte, NC
I dont have a solid answer to that question but I would stick with the 1.2 cal for your guys. K.I.S.S. (Not calling you stupid)

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:19 am
 Arc Level

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:49 pm
Posts: 498
Location: New England
I answered one of my own questions. The 1.5 cal rule is ONLY for "Voltage Levels above 600V". I saw the 1.5 cal rule in the Annex, but in the body of the text 130.3.2 the headers is "Voltage Levels above 600V" so then anything that follows even if not specified would have to fall in that category.

But can someone answer why the 1.5 cal rule came to be and how it performs for FR clothing built to a 1.2 cal world.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:23 am
 Arc Level

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:49 pm
Posts: 498
Location: New England
Zog, no offense taken. "Stupid is as stupid does". I use the 1.2 cal value regardless of voltage because its not worth dealing with the complexity to gain a few inches in arc boundary. But I still would like to know why its there. For the 2014 release - I plan to submit a whole new guideline to totally replace Art 130 - and it will be 2 pages long.

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 7 hours

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Forum Library / Articles The Lounge    Question of the Week - What Do You Think?    Arcflashforum.com Feedback and Announcements    Off Topic Discussions    News in Electrical Safety Arc Flash and Electrical Safety    General Discussion    Electrical Safety Practices    Equipment to Reduce Arc Flash Dangers    Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Arc Flash Studies    General Discussion    Arc Flash Labels    Software for Arc Flash Studies    System Modeling and Calculations    NEW! Electrode Configuration Library – 2018 IEEE 1584 Codes and Standards    CSA Z462 Workplace Electrical Safety    EAWR Electricity at Work Regulations, HSE - Europe    OSHA CFR Title 29    IEEE 1584 - Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations    NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code - NEC (R)    NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code    NFPA 70E - Electrical Safety in the Workplace    2015 NFPA 70E Share It Here    Arc Flash Photos    Your Stories    What's Wrong Here? by Joe Tedesco
© 2019 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883