alf wrote:
When doing the short circuit analysis with a current limiting fuse (CLF), ETAP models it as if it is not in the circuit. The resulting momentary analysis shows the downstream equipment over dutied when in fact it is not. Any ideas on how to handle this?
The way that a series rating works (current limiting device protecting downstream equipment) is the non limited current is used - such as you are correctly seeing with ETAP.
UL provides a method for testing combinations of devices in series which can lead to a listed series rating.
As an example: Let's say you have a panel rated 22kA and an available short circuit current of 37kA. The panel is protected upstream by a specific size and class of current limiting fuse. If a UL listed combination of the fuse and panel exists, it would be labeled (NEC requirement) on the equipment. It may be something like "Series Rating 100,000 Amps" or some other rating (I made this particular one up just as an example).
A long time ago (over 30 years) a method or predicting the "let thru" current was commonly used which is what I believe you might have been expecting. The breaker industry (I was at Square D at the time) found there were problems in using this method and the UL series ratings were developed. i.e. instead of predicting what may happen and sometimes having problems, test it, rate it, be sure of how it will work.
So, in your case you need to check with the breaker manufacturer to see what series rating they have and what devices upstream need to be used to achieve the rating.