2018 NFPA 70E – 40 cal/cm2 Threshold (may be) Deleted

Finally!  The 40 cal/cm2 threshold my finally be deleted.

The For many years, the 40 cal/cm2 threshold that is part of Informational Note 3 presently found in the 2015 Edition of NFPA 70E Section 130.7(A) has been the subject of constant debate. 

BUY NOW: 2018 NFPA 70E Changes Part 1

 

 

The existing language states:

Informational Note No. 3: When incident energy exceeds 40 cal/cm2 at the working distance, greater emphasis may be necessary with respect to de-energizing when exposed to electrical hazards.

The often cited rational for using the 40 cal/cm2 threshold in Informational Note 3 was about protecting a worker from blast pressure.   This value selected as a point where blast pressure was considered to be a significant hazard and hence, a greater emphasis should be given to de-energizing.

The two major variables that define the magnitude of the prospective incident energy from an arc flash are the arcing short circuit AND the arc duration defined by how long it takes a protective device to clear the event.  This means (as many are well aware) that a low arcing short circuit current with an unusually long protective device clearing time determined from the device’s time current curve, can result in a very large calculated incident energy – often exceeding the 40 cal/cm2 threshold.

Download FREE Arc Flash Calculations

However, blast pressure is NOT a direct function of incident energy.  It is a function of the short circuit current and the rate of energy release.  Although it may be possible to calculate very large incident energy value because of a protective device’s clearing time, it is not a true indicator of blast pressure.

The 2018 Edition of NFPA 70E – Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace may finally see Informational Note 3 and the 40 cal/cm2 threshold eliminated.  Based on Public Input Submittals for the First Draft and the corresponding NFPA 70 Committee Statement,  it appears Informational Note 3 will be deleted since greater emphasis should always be placed on de-energizing regardless of the incident energy level.

Although there are several more stages before this is finalized, the deletion of Informational Note 3 would be a welcome change that will go a long way towards eliminating the confusion (and sometimes panic) that results when the seemingly arbitrary  40 cal/cm2 threshold is exceeded.

By Jim Phillips | Brainfiller, Inc. | ArcFlashForum.com

 

About Jim Phillips: Electrical Power and Arc Flash Training Programs – For over 30 years, Jim Phillips has been helping tens of thousands of people around the world, understand electrical power system design, analysis, arc flash and electrical safety.

NFPA70E 2018 Update video by Jim PhillipsJim is Vice Chair of IEEE 1584, International Chairman of IEC TC78 Live Working and Steering Committee Member – IEEE/NFPA Arc Flash Collaborative Research Project. He has developed a reputation for being one of the best trainers in the electric power industry.  Learn More


Arc Flash & Electrical Power Training Classes
 by Jim Phillips Click Here

Arc Flash & Electrical Power Training Products by Jim Phillips Click Here

Sign-up for my monthly publication “Grey Matter” which contains news about new standards, conferences, technical articles, Electrical Engineering news and more! Click Here