Arc Flash & Electrical Power Training by Jim Phillips | 800.874.8883 | +1 480.275.7451
Arc Flash & Electrical Power Training | Brainfiller
Arc Flash & Electrical Power Training by Jim Phillips | 800.874.8883 | +1 480.275.7451
How Does Everyone Else Do This?
By Jim Phillips
3-Part Series
ARC FLASH LABELS
This question is a variation of the one about the 40 cal/cm2 limit in Informational Note 3 of NFPA 70E 130.7. However, this question concerns arc flash labels.
Where the calculated incident energy exceeds 40 cal/cm2, many arc flash labels use a red background with white “Danger” as the signal word. However, many of these labels also have language that states, “No Safe PPE Available,” or something similar, even though PPE is available with arc ratings upward of 100 cal/cm2.
Question: For locations where the incident energy is greater than 40 cal/cm2, which of the following are used for your companies or client’s labels?
Danger: 37%
No safe PPE exists: 29%
Energized work prohibited: 28%
None of these: 1%
Something else: 2%
We don’t have locations > 40 cal/cm2
(Respondents were instructed to select up to three options.)
You might think having label requirements defined by NFPA 70E as well as calculation methods from IEEE 1584 for more than a decade that most equipment would have an arc flash warning label by now. That is not the case, according to the answers to this question.
Question: Do you still find electrical equipment without an arc flash label (that should have one)?
Yes: 97%
No: 3%
Many still correlate the calculated incident energy with categories or levels. Often this has meant that, if the prospective incident energy was less than 1.2 cal/cm2 at the working distance, it would be listed as “Level 0.” This question was asked a few months after the 2015 edition of NFPA 70E was published.
Question: How do/will you label equipment with a calculated incident energy less than 1.2 cal/cm2?
We still use “0”: 56%
We will list the incident energy: 25%
We will list a minimum arc rating such as 4 or 8 cal/cm2: 12%
Something else: 7%
NFPA 70E lists the minimum requirements for information to be included on the arc flash label. The list does not include the date.
Question: Do you feel the date of the study should be included on the arc flash warning labels?
Yes: 93%
No: 7%
So you think you are the only person with a particular question? Highly unlikely. Many questions are quite common and also frequently asked.
Note: The survey responses and accompanying commentary may not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NFPA, IEEE or other standards and organizations.
Attend an upcoming Arc flash safety training course by Jim Phillips to:
Click here for upcoming scheduled Arc Flash Safety Training and arc flash certification.
All Scheduled Electrical Safety Training https://brainfiller.com/scheduled-events/
Request an Onsite Training: https://brainfiller.com/on-site-training/
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |