It is currently Mon Sep 20, 2021 4:29 pm

Author Message

 Post subject: Application range of methods in IEEE1584Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:59 am

Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:19 am
Posts: 1
Hello everyone,

The application range for the empirical method is clearly defined : 208V to 15kV and a bolted fault current between 700A and 106kA.

But for the theoretical method, what is the applicable bolted fault current range ?
Can it be used for any voltage ?

The position about the type of bolted fault current is also not clear. Is it only for 3-phase fault ? Or 1-phase fault can be treated ?

How do you understand those ? Do you use another standard in case of you're out of one of the above range ?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Application range of methods in IEEE1584Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:56 am
 Plasma Level

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 2174
Location: North Carolina
BleAtenas wrote:
Hello everyone,

The application range for the empirical method is clearly defined : 208V to 15kV and a bolted fault current between 700A and 106kA.

But for the theoretical method, what is the applicable bolted fault current range ?
Can it be used for any voltage ?

The position about the type of bolted fault current is also not clear. Is it only for 3-phase fault ? Or 1-phase fault can be treated ?

How do you understand those ? Do you use another standard in case of you're out of one of the above range ?

The Lee theoretical equation is just that...theoretical. It does not have an application range as such. It is designed specifically for 3 phase bolted faults and the rest of IEEE 1584 should make it clear that no part of the standard applies to single phase faults.

In practice Lee does OK below 600 V but severely overpredicts incident energy as the voltage increases because it does not recognize that arcing voltage is almost constant at higher voltages. At the low end it severely overpredicts because it does not predict arc restriking accurately. It is also limited to open air conditions and does not accurately reflect the "focussing" effect that an enclosure has (arc-in-a-box).

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 7 hours

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Forum Library / Articles The Lounge    Question of the Week - What Do You Think?    Arcflashforum.com Feedback and Announcements    Off Topic Discussions    News in Electrical Safety Arc Flash and Electrical Safety    General Discussion    Electrical Safety Practices    Equipment to Reduce Arc Flash Dangers    Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Arc Flash Studies    General Discussion    Arc Flash Labels    Software for Arc Flash Studies    System Modeling and Calculations    NEW! Electrode Configuration Library – 2018 IEEE 1584 Codes and Standards    CSA Z462 Workplace Electrical Safety    EAWR Electricity at Work Regulations, HSE - Europe    OSHA CFR Title 29    IEEE 1584 - Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations    NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code - NEC (R)    NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code    NFPA 70E - Electrical Safety in the Workplace    2015 NFPA 70E Share It Here    Arc Flash Photos    Your Stories    What's Wrong Here? by Joe Tedesco
© 2019 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883