Question
Most arc-flash labels as required by NFPA 70E appear with the word “WARNING” on an orange background. However, I occasionally see red labels and even green labels.
So… what color is correct?
Answer
The technically correct answer is: it depends.
To understand why, we need to separate what NFPA 70E requires, what ANSI standards define, and what has become common industry practice.
NFPA 70E and Arc-Flash Labels
NFPA 70E requires that electrical equipment likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized be field marked with an arc-flash label. The label must include specific information such as:
- Nominal system voltage
- Arc-flash boundary
- Incident energy or PPE requirements
However, NFPA 70E does not specify label colors or signal words. That part is left to other standards—primarily ANSI Z535.
ANSI Z535 Signal Words and Colors
The ANSI Z535 series defines safety signs and tags used to warn people of personal injury hazards. It defines signal words, each associated with a specific color, based on the severity of the hazard if it is not avoided.
Yellow / CAUTION
- Potential for minor or moderate injury
Orange / WARNING
- Could result in serious injury or death
Red / DANGER
- Will result in death or serious injury if not avoided
From a purely technical standpoint, arc-flash hazards can be fatal, which raises the obvious question:
Shouldn’t arc-flash labels be red?
Why Most Arc-Flash Labels Are Orange
Despite the severity of arc-flash hazards, industry practice has informally standardized on orange “WARNING” labels for most arc-flash applications.
Why?
- Red/DANGER on a red background is typically reserved for situations where exposure is unavoidable or immediate
As a result, orange WARNING labels strike a balance; they communicate serious risk without overstating severity. Red/DANGER labels are normally used for extreme incident energy levels, but there is no consensus threshold defined in NFPA 70E or ANSI.
What About Red Arc-Flash Labels?
Red/DANGER labels are not prohibited, but they should be used carefully and consistently.
Using red for normal arc-flash hazards can:
- Dilute the meaning of DANGER labels
- Create inconsistency across a facility
- Lead to “label fatigue” where everything looks equally severe
If red labels are used, it should be part of a clearly documented labeling philosophy, ideally referenced in the arc-flash study or electrical safety program.
Historically, Red/DANGER labels were used when the calculated incident energy exceeded 40 cal/cm2 due to an informational note from NFPA 70E stating: “When incident energy exceeds 40 cal/cm2 at the working distance, greater emphasis may be necessary with respect to de-energizing when exposed to electrical hazards.”
The 2018 Edition of NFPA 70E deleted this note since the emphasis should always be to de-energize not just above 40 cal/cm2.
And Green Labels? 🚨
This is where things go off the rails.
Green is not an ANSI Z535 hazard color.
Some arc-flash software packages allow custom color schemes, and I have seen green labels occasionally appear when:
- Incident energy is below 1.2 cal/cm²
The problem?
A green label can easily be interpreted as “safe”—and electrical equipment is never hazard-free.
Even when incident energy is low:
- Shock hazards still exist
- Arc-flash energy is not zero
- NFPA 70E still treats the task as potentially hazardous
Using green for arc-flash labels can create a false sense of security and is not aligned with ANSI Z535 intent.
Best Practice for Arc-Flash Label Colors
To stay aligned with NFPA 70E, ANSI Z535, and accepted industry practice:
- Orange / WARNING is used for most arc-flash labels
- Red / DANGER is typically used for extreme conditions
- Yellow / CAUTION although this is one of the ANSI Z535 colors, it is normally not considered strong enough language for the arc flash hazard.
- Avoid using anything other than Red and Orange such as green and similar non-hazard colors (blue, pink etc.) for arc-flash hazard labels.
- Be consistent across the facility
- Document your labeling philosophy in the arc-flash study or electrical safety program
Consistency and clarity matter just as much as technical accuracy.
Key Takeaways
- NFPA 70E requires arc-flash labels but does not specify colors
- ANSI Z535 defines hazard colors and signal words
- Orange / WARNING is the most common and widely accepted arc-flash label color
- Red / DANGER may be used sparingly for extreme hazards
- Green is not appropriate for arc-flash hazard labels and may imply a safe condition
About Jim Phillips
With a career beginning in 1981 and Brainfiller launching in 1987, Jim has built a global reputation as a trusted leader in electrical safety.
He currently:
- Serves on multiple electrical safety and standards committees, including NFPA 70E, IEEE 1584, IEC TC78, and the National Electrical Code (CMP-4).
- Has authored over 100 technical articles and has been a Contributing Editor for Electrical Contractor Magazine (NECA) since 2009.
- Holds leadership positions in international working groups that shape arc flash, live working, and risk assessment standards.
- Has delivered keynotes and workshops in 20+ countries for engineers, utilities, and industrial organizations.
💡 Did you know? Many NFPA 70E trainers learn the material by attending Jim’s classes—while Jim is involved directly with the standards they teach.
NFPA 70E Training Courses Available Through Brainfiller
Brainfiller offers several courses designed and taught by Jim, all targeted to engineers, electricians, and safety professionals.All training is available live, on-site, or on-demand, and includes completion certificates with CEU/PDH documentation.NFPA 70E Qualified Worker Training (8 hours)
Covers risk assessment, PPE, LOTO, establishing an electrically safe work condition, and auditing requirements.How to Perform an Arc-Flash Study | IEEE 1584 (16 hours)
Modeling, arcing current, incident energy, arc-flash boundaries, and system-level mitigation.Fundamentals of Electrical Safety (2 hours)
Shock hazards, arc-flash basics, and the building blocks behind NFPA 70E.DC Electrical Safety Fundamentals (2 hours)
Key safety practices for data centers and DC systems.
How Jim Stays Ahead of Developing Safety Trends
Because Jim is embedded in NFPA, IEEE, IEC, and NEC committees, he sees emerging trends before they appear in the codebook.
His training materials are updated immediately after each standards cycle, keeping teams aligned with NFPA 70E, IEEE 1584, and OSHA expectations.
🔧 From code to craft: Jim explains why requirements exist and how to apply them correctly in real electrical systems.
Benefits of Choosing Jim Phillips and Brainfiller
- Direct insight from a standards insider
- Reduced incidents and stronger compliance
- Consistent updates in line with every NFPA 70E cycle
- Flexible learning formats
- Practical, defensible training grounded in real-world conditions
Partnering with Jim Phillips ensures your team learns NFPA 70E and arc-flash safety from someone who has helped guide the direction of the standard—not from copied material.








